I
honestly can’t make up my mind or my heart about Sue Monk Kidd’s latest novel,
the Mermaid Chair. In my eyes, the Mermaid Chair certainly doesn’t live up
to the magic spell cast by Kidd’s first novel, the Secret Life of Bees (which you should read if you haven’t already).
Much
like my experience reading the Secret
Life of Bees, it took me more than a few chapters to really “get into” the Mermaid Chair (and even then, my
enthusiasm was still touch and go for the greater part of the novel). The Mermaid Chair essentially details the
mid-life crisis of the central character, Jessie, who experiences a
life-altering transformation through coming to terms with a past (and present) tragedy,
in addition to having an affair with a monk. At its core, the Mermaid Chair is a story about the
never-ending ways in which we as humans struggle to define (and redefine)
ourselves with time. Jessie, a woman who is discontent with solely fulfilling
her roles as both mother and wife, abandons everything for a love affair. She
eventually realizes that she is really seeking a reinvention of self, and the
space to grow into and to truly redefine herself.
There
is a key phrase that is repeated within the novel: “a solitude of being.”
Essentially, the phrase is referring to the human necessity to be alone and
have the space to reconnect with oneself (a sort of self-discovery, if you will).
I really believe that Solitude of Being
(or something a little jazzier) would have encapsulated the thematic
significance of the novel much better than the title: Mermaid Chair. While the “mermaid chair” itself does exist as a
physical object (and an important one at that) within the novel, as the title,
it seems to lack imagination and (let’s face it) it sounds blasé.
It
appeared to me throughout the novel that Sue Monk Kidd tried to include too
much in terms of her storyline. Right off the bat, readers learn about the
strained relationships Jessie has with her husband and her mother, and her
borderline obsession with the death of her father. Along with all of this, Kidd
details the steamy relationship between the monk, Brother Thomas (including his
back-story) and Jessie. To me, the fascinating theme in the Mermaid Chair is that of
self-exploration and self-knowledge. It seemed as if the majority of the plot
choices did not enhance or support this theme in the best possible way.
I
can sum up the few additional problems I encountered along my reading journey
in 3 specific points. Firstly, there was a very quick beginning and end to the
affair between Jessie and Brother Thomas (or Whit, as he refers to himself
outside of the cloistered setting). The whole affair seemed a bit too easy and
untroubled…Neither Jessie or Brother Thomas appeared tormented or torn about
the repercussions of their actions; and at the end, Kidd explained the entire
affair away quickly and without much fanfare or introspection. The entirety of
the affair was integral in the formation of both Jessie and Brother Thomas, but
Sue Monk Kidd ignored the raw reality of an affair from the points of view of
both characters.
Secondly,
the novel itself appeared to lack consistency and order. Sue Monk Kidd devoted
the majority of her novel to retelling the story from the point of view of
Jessie (understandable…since she is the protagonist). However, Kidd also
allowed Brother Thomas to share his insights and voice with readers in random
chapters throughout the Mermaid Chair.
And, near the end of the novel, Kidd even devotes one chapter to share the
perspective of Hugh, Jessie’s husband. The chapters revolving around the
perspectives of Brother Thomas and Hugh help to transform both characters from
flat to round. I personally believe that the chapters which showcase Hugh’s
voice as well as that of Brother Thomas gave validity to the story, and made
both characters appear more relatable. In an attempt to allow readers to
greater relate to the actions/ thoughts of all the characters, Sue Monk Kidd perhaps
should’ve allowed Hugh’s voice (or even that of Jessie’s mother and father) to
be heard from more often. To me, the delineation of narrative choices for each
chapter seemed a bit haphazard and overall, ineffective.
Lastly, Jessie retells the story of
the summer of her affair in flashback form; the story that she weaves has already
occurred. Personally, I think that the Mermaid
Chair might have been more interesting and attention holding if it had been
expressed in the present tense rather than through Jessie reliving her past
memories.
I
believe that a fantastic writer has the ability to make a reader feel down to
the core of their being, a deep connection to a character’s situation and
emotions; and a truly talented writer transports a reader to another time and
place. And, to be completely honest, I remained firmly planted (mind, body and
spirit) in my house while reading the Mermaid
Chair (no transporting happened). On the other hand, I also cannot
truthfully dismiss this novel; it was an imaginative story line and
communicated a clear and important theme. Sue Monk Kidd is a good writer, but
she didn’t hit this one out of the ballpark in my eyes.
No comments:
Post a Comment